🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts about the remarks made by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's victory over the American player during the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents American, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. Some letdown was understandable. Rather, he invoked the ongoing drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.

We all love a narrative, me too. But come on. Even if Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, whom Fritz has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, against whom Fritz had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the last seven grand slams (and the Spaniard proceeded to defeat a tired Djokovic in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he in fact preferred his draw, because it offered the chance to beat the three best players in the sport in succession. He is well justified to aspire to the achievement; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic quarter-final who else sensibly had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the world entering the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his previous six encounters over No 3 Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the future. But it’s clear that right now, that is as high as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of performance metrics away. His elite delivery and concussive strength on each forehand and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to dispose of the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is frequently overmatched. The last several years has witnessed the curious rise of lanky, towering players who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming speed and fluidity of much shorter men. He is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite severe restriction on his potential.

Fritz has made a several dramatic, unexpected advancements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was sniffing the top 10. The previous season, he unexpectedly surged to No 4 – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, Sinner, and even a declining Serbian, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing slump of American men lifting major titles when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best run to the All England Club semi-finals in July.

Fritz’s play in that exact last eight match should have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a victory that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a few match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the exchanges, with Fritz creating plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic saved break point after break point, extending the run to the brink of agony. When he finally did claim a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a terrible game to drop serve again; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish peripheral to the main contest and compelled him to expend far too much energy to prevail. Down set points in the final game, Fritz’s primary delivery floated to heaven. He prolonged the contest two times on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, only a result of needing to hit too many second serves.

The contest was quite ironclad evidence that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of the Serbian, that lost to the Spaniard in the next round and did not especially appeared like he believed he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his athletic abilities now, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The problem is those who were expecting Fritz to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, thoughtful presence in press conferences, more so than almost everyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only say his emotions or the strategy he felt decided a match, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for the United States failing to produce a male major champion since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” the American told an interviewer in the summer of winning a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is actually extremely improbable for everybody else. {