🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.